Grapes...

Friday, May 4, 2007

The end...

Looking back, would you say that Steinbeck's symbolism really helped the story or do you think it was just irrelevant nonsense?

8 comments:

EKL said...

Truthfully, I think we were all reading WAY too far into it. But, that's what analyzing books is for, right?

ferris said...

well...if we think back to what Frank McCormick said, he was not too fond of ripping apart books. However, this is English class, and we have too. I do not think we went too far into it because we did not lose what was going on in the story, if that makes any sense at all.

Al Capone said...

In a way, both...some was necessary, other stuff just confused me

Dr.Acula said...

Hmmm...I'd have to go will 'irrelevant nonsense' for 200, Alex.

kelso said...

I think some of his symbolism was interesting and almost helpful, but then other parts of it were just not needed, and even made parts of it made the story confusing.

dreamcrusher said...

it really bothers me when ppl call a great literary classic "irrelevant nonsense." just b/c we don't really understand it, or we get confused, doesn't mean we know what the heck we're talking about. maybe we're just too stupid to get it...

Anonymous said...

even if we don't get the whole picture with the symbols, thinking about what they could mean is pretty fun. There was this one guy who found the journey to zen enlightenment through the wizard of oz! so we get to do the same thing

green hippo lover said...

I think that a lot of us found the symbolism irrelevant becuase we become frusterated with trying to figure it all out, when the events going on in the book have nothing to do with our current lives.But it is though people analyzing of books that life lessons are learned with out having to actually go though the hard ships are selves. ok that really doesn't make sense but i think you get my point.