Grapes...

Wednesday, April 4, 2007

...Description??

Does anyone notice how Steinbeck is devoting entire chapters to description of setting, clothing, and emotion?? All of chapter 5 was devoted to the mechanical "rape" of the countryside and of the farmland. Does anyone find the whole pathos approach incredibly effective??

10 comments:

agb said...

Yeah I noticed that.
I thought it was pretty interesting because Steinback is telling the story of Tom Joad and of the croppers but they are not combined... yet.
I think it is very effective.

crispy chicken said...

I like all of the effort Steinbeck puts in to describing all of the small details. Even though he takes large amounts of the book to describe very small details, it gives you a good sense of the feeling of the book and the setting Steinbeck's is giving the book.

Megan said...

I noticed, and thought it was boring.

alibama said...

He seems to like to talk about rape and sex a lot. Is that absolutely necessary??

Anonymous said...

Yeah I began noticing that in chapter two...he described the HUGE truck and the exhaust. The clothing...every little detail about the yellow shoe....blah blah blah...it gets repetitive and annoying at times but like christof said it is nice because it does give you a good sense of the scene and the life style pf the people in the book.

jesUSAves said...

yea, i think its cool that, like bella said, he is sort of telling two different stories that will soon combine into one. i don't know that i liked the whole turtle chapter, or all the painstaking details...but i think overall, it will be effective.

Gazellia said...

I think it was kinda cool that the guy that ran over the turtle seems to be the guy that picked up Joad.

Or maybe it just seems like it.

I also noticed that Steinback is very obsessed about machines... why is that?

Dr.Acula said...

I agree with fool killer. I was bored out of my skull.
Repetitiveness, in my opinion, is awfully dry. And THAT MUCH description sort of makes me want to kill myself.
I'm just sayin'.

ferris said...

So Steinback is reminding me of Charles Dickens with vivid descriptions up the kazoo. Its interesting because it makes you feel like you are there, in the middle of the dust bowl. I felt like chapter five was saying the same thing over and over and over though.

camen said...

Yes, I noticed the description. I think it's extremely effective, and the pathos is doing an incredible job of setting the stage. This story is supposed to be about a family of immigrants who are forced from their lands. It only makes sense that pathos would be used. I like Steinbeck's style.